CO129-259 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [5-8] — Page 41

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

an improvement that they require no comment. The important changes made in paragraph 14 concerning the number of daily attendances (200 reduced to 100) are required, and in the Building Grant Regulations (paragraph 29 or 27 subsection) have come into force several years ago with the approval of the Secretary of State (our Notification No. 430 in Government Gazette of 18th October 1890 and Gazette No. 382 of 7-8 January 1888, Secretary of State's despatch No. 16 of January 1888). The principal omissions that require explanation are the two sections, #17 and 20 of the old scheme, offering high rates of grant for the encouragement of schools giving English in addition to a Chinese education (A. 17) and requiring a European education in any European language with Chinese in addition. The fact that for the last twenty years only one school attempted the former kind of work (proving a disastrous failure within the year of its starting) and that no school whatever attempted the hybrid kind of work involved in teaching English and Chinese side by side (with the signal exception of the Victoria College, which is not under the Grant-in-Aid Scheme and has the purse of Government to draw upon) is sufficient excuse for dropping out of the scheme provisions which remained a dead letter all along, inapplicable to the educational requirements of the Colony.

10. I beg therefore to recommend that the new Code of Regulations for Educational Grants-in-Aid, which I now submit in draft form, be approved by the Government.

Edit History

2026-05-27 01:03:30 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
an improvement that they require no comment. The important changes made in paragraph 14 concerning the number of daily attendances (200 reduced to 100) are required, and in the Building Grant Regulations (paragraph 29 or 27 subsection) have come into force several years ago with the approval of the Secretary of State (our Notification No. 430 in Government Gazette of 18th October 1890 and Gazette No. 382 of 7-8 January 1888, Secretary of State's despatch No. 16 of January 1888). The principal omissions that require explanation are the two sections, #17 and 20 of the old scheme, offering high rates of grant for the encouragement of schools giving English in addition to a Chinese education (A. 17) and requiring a European education in any European language with Chinese in addition. The fact that for the last twenty years only one school attempted the former kind of work (proving a disastrous failure within the year of its starting) and that no school whatever attempted the hybrid kind of work involved in teaching English and Chinese side by side (with the signal exception of the Victoria College, which is not under the Grant-in-Aid Scheme and has the purse of Government to draw upon) is sufficient excuse for dropping out of the scheme provisions which remained a dead letter all along, inapplicable to the educational requirements of the Colony. 10. I beg therefore to recommend that the new Code of Regulations for Educational Grants-in-Aid, which I now submit in draft form, be approved by the Government.
Baseline (Original)
am improvement that they require no comment. The important changes made in paragraph 14 concerning the number of daily attendances. (200 reduced to 100] required, and in the Building Grant Regulations (paragraph 29 or 27 subsection of have come into forec severals with years ago wr the approval of the secretary of State (ou Notification to 430 in Govern- ment Gazet the of 18th October 1890 and Gazette of 382 7-8 Secretary of States despatch 16 of it for January 1888). The principal oncis- sions that require explanation are the two sections, # 17 and 20 of the old scheme, offering high rates grant for the encoura schools giving with English schools ui argenrent ent of of a Chinese education. English in addition (A. 17) and qiring a European education any European language with Chinese in addition. The fact that for for the last twenty years only 38 one school attempted the former kind of work / proving within the a disastrous failure year of its starting) and that no school whatever attempted the hybrid in :brid kind of work involved teaching English and Chinese side by side / with the signal the Victoria College exception of which is not under the Grant-in Aid Scheme and has the purse of t to draw upon) is the of Government to draw sufficient excuse for dropping out is the scheme provisions which re- manied a dead letter all along. mapplicable to the educational require. ments of the Colony. 10. to I beg h recor mena therefore that the new Code of Re- :- gulations for Educational Grants-in- Aid, which I now submit in draft from, be approved by the Govern ment 1
2026-05-27 01:03:30 · Baseline
View content

am

improvement that they require no comment. The important changes made in paragraph 14 concerning

the number

of daily

attendances.

(200 reduced to 100] required, and in the Building Grant Regulations (paragraph 29 or 27 subsection of have come into forec severals

with

years ago wr the approval of the secretary of State (ou Notification to 430 in Govern-

ment Gazet

the of 18th October 1890 and

Gazette of

382

7-8

Secretary of States despatch 16 of it for January 1888). The principal oncis- sions that require explanation are the two sections, # 17 and 20 of the old scheme, offering high rates grant for the encoura

schools giving

with English

schools

ui

argenrent

ent of

of

a Chinese education.

English in addition (A.

17) and

qiring a European education

any European language with Chinese in addition. The fact that

for

for

the last twenty years only

38

one

school attempted the former kind of

work / proving

within the

a disastrous failure

year of its starting) and

that no school whatever attempted

the hybrid

in

:brid kind of work involved teaching English

and Chinese

side by side / with the signal

the Victoria College

exception of

which is not under the Grant-in

Aid Scheme and has the purse of t to draw upon) is

the

of

Government to draw sufficient excuse for dropping out

is

the scheme provisions which re- manied a dead letter all along. mapplicable to the educational require. ments of the Colony.

10.

to

I beg h

recor

mena

therefore that the new Code of Re- :- gulations for Educational Grants-in-

Aid, which I now submit in draft

from, be approved by

the Govern

ment

1

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.